Boost C++ Libraries

...one of the most highly regarded and expertly designed C++ library projects in the world. Herb Sutter and Andrei Alexandrescu, C++ Coding Standards

libs/test/doc/testing_tools/expected_failures.qbk

[/
 / Copyright (c) 2003 Boost.Test contributors
 /
 / Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. (See accompanying
 / file LICENSE_1_0.txt or copy at http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt)
 /]

[section:expected_failures Expected failures specification]

While in a perfect world all test assertions should pass in order for a test module to pass, in some situations
it is desirable to temporarily allow particular tests to fail. For example, where a particular feature is not
implemented yet and one needs to prepare a library for the release or when particular test fails on some
platforms. To avoid a nagging red box in regression tests table, you can use the expected failures feature.


This feature allows specifying an expected number of failed assertions per test unit. The value is specified
during test tree construction, and can't be updated during test execution.

The feature is not intended to be used to check for expected functionality failures. To check that a particular
input is causing an exception to be thrown use __BOOST_LEVEL_THROW__ family of testing
tools.

The usage of this feature should be limited and employed only after careful consideration. In general you should
only use this feature when it is necessary to force a test module to pass without actually fixing the problem.
Obviously, an excessive usage of expected failures defeats the purpose of the unit test. In most cases it only
needs be applied temporarily.

You also need to remember that the expected failure specification is per test case. This means that any failed
assertion within that test case can satisfy the expected failures quota. Meaning it is possible for an
unexpected failure to occur to satisfy this quota.


[note If an assertion at fault is fixed and passed while an expected failures specification still present,
      the number of failures becomes smaller than expected. The test is going to be reported as passed; instead,
      a warning message will be issued.
]


[/-----------------------------------------------------------------]
[#l_expected_failure][h3 Expected failure specification]

The decorator __decorator_expected_failures__ defines the number of assertions that are expected to fail within the corresponding test
unit. It is reported as failure when the number of failed assertions is greater than the declared expected number of
failures. If the number of failed assertions is less than the number of expected failures a message is reported. The
total number of expected failures for a given test suite `S` is the sum of the declared expected failures in `S` and the
sum of expected failures in all nested test units:

[bt_example decorator_10..decorator expected_failures..run-fail]

In the above example, we first run all test cases with four failed assertions. The total number of expected failures
is 3: 1 (for test `suite1`) + 2 (for `test1`). Because the expected failure count is exceeded, the error is reported.
In the second case, we only run test case `suite1/test1`: two failures occur, two failures are expected, therefore no
error is reported.




[/-----------------------------------------------------------------]
[h3 Usage with automatically registered test cases]

[caution this usage is considered as deprecated. Please consider using the [link l_expected_failure `expected_failures`]
 decorator instead.]

For backwards compatibility, it is possible to indicate the expected failures with
__BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES__ [footnote deprecated] before the test case definition.

``
BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES(test_case_name, number_of_expected_failures);
``

You can use this macro both on a file scope and inside a test suite. Moreover you can use it even if name of test
units coincide in different test suites. Expected failures specification applies to the test unit belonging to the same
test suite where __BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE_EXPECTED_FAILURES__ resides.

[bt_example example17..Expected failures specification for automatically registered test case..run]


[/-----------------------------------------------------------------]
[h3 Usage with manually registered test cases]

[caution this usage is considered as deprecated. Please consider using the [link l_expected_failure `expected_failures`]
 decorator instead.]

To set the value of expected failures for the manually registered test unit pass it as a second argument for the
[link ref_test_case_registration `test_suite::add`] call during test unit registration.

[bt_example example16..Expected failures specification for manually registered test case..run]

[endsect] [/ expected failures]

[/EOF]