The scoped_ptr class template stores a pointer to a dynamically allocated object. (Dynamically allocated objects are allocated with the C++ new expression.) The object pointed to is guaranteed to be deleted, either on destruction of the scoped_ptr, or via an explicit reset. See the example.

scoped_ptr is a simple solution for simple needs. It supplies a basic "resource acquisition is initialization" facility, without shared-ownership or transfer-of-ownership semantics. Both its name and enforcement of semantics (by being noncopyable) signal its intent to retain ownership solely within the current scope. Because it is noncopyable, it is safer than shared_ptr for pointers which should not be copied.

Because scoped_ptr is simple, in its usual implementation every operation is as fast as for a built-in pointer and it has no more space overhead that a built-in pointer.

scoped_ptr cannot be used in C++ Standard Library containers. Use shared_ptr or std::unique_ptr if you need a smart pointer that can.

scoped_ptr cannot correctly hold a pointer to a dynamically allocated array. See scoped_array for that usage.

The class template is parameterized on T, the type of the object pointed to. Destroying T must not thow exceptions, and T must be complete at the point scoped_ptr<T>::~scoped_ptr is instantiated.

scoped_ptr is defined in <boost/smart_ptr/scoped_ptr.hpp>.

Here’s an example that uses scoped_ptr.

The example program produces the beginning of a child’s nursery rhyme:

The primary reason to use scoped_ptr rather than std::auto_ptr or std::unique_ptr is to let readers of your code know that you intend "resource acquisition is initialization" to be applied only for the current scope, and have no intent to transfer ownership.

A secondary reason to use scoped_ptr is to prevent a later maintenance programmer from adding a function that transfers ownership by returning the auto_ptr, because the maintenance programmer saw auto_ptr, and assumed ownership could safely be transferred.

Think of bool vs int. We all know that under the covers bool is usually just an int. Indeed, some argued against including bool in the C++ standard because of that. But by coding bool rather than int, you tell your readers what your intent is. Same with scoped_ptr; by using it you are signaling intent.

It has been suggested that scoped_ptr<T> is equivalent to std::auto_ptr<T> const. Ed Brey pointed out, however, that reset will not work on a std::auto_ptr<T> const.

One common usage of scoped_ptr is to implement a handle/body (also called pimpl) idiom which avoids exposing the body (implementation) in the header file.

The scoped_ptr_example_test.cpp sample program includes a header file, scoped_ptr_example.hpp, which uses a scoped_ptr<> to an incomplete type to hide the implementation. The instantiation of member functions which require a complete type occurs in the scoped_ptr_example.cpp implementation file.

The scoped_array class template stores a pointer to a dynamically allocated array. (Dynamically allocated arrays are allocated with the C++ new[] expression.) The array pointed to is guaranteed to be deleted, either on destruction of the scoped_array, or via an explicit reset.

The scoped_array template is a simple solution for simple needs. It supplies a basic "resource acquisition is initialization" facility, without shared-ownership or transfer-of-ownership semantics. Both its name and enforcement of semantics (by being noncopyable) signal its intent to retain ownership solely within the current scope. Because it is noncopyable, it is safer than shared_ptr<T[]> for pointers which should not be copied.

Because scoped_array is so simple, in its usual implementation every operation is as fast as a built-in array pointer and it has no more space overhead that a built-in array pointer.

It cannot be used in C++ standard library containers. See shared_ptr<T[]> if scoped_array does not meet your needs.

It cannot correctly hold a pointer to a single object. See scoped_ptr for that usage.

std::vector is an alternative to scoped_array that is a bit heavier duty but far more flexible. boost::array is an alternative that does not use dynamic allocation.

The class template is parameterized on T, the type of the object pointed to.

scoped_array is defined in <boost/smart_ptr/scoped_array.hpp>.

The shared_ptr class template stores a pointer to a dynamically allocated object, typically with a C++ new-expression. The object pointed to is guaranteed to be deleted when the last shared_ptr pointing to it is destroyed or reset.

shared_ptr deletes the exact pointer that has been passed at construction time, complete with its original type, regardless of the template parameter. In the second example above, when p2 is destroyed or reset, it will call delete on the original int* that has been passed to the constructor, even though p2 itself is of type shared_ptr<void> and stores a pointer of type void*.

Every shared_ptr meets the CopyConstructible, MoveConstructible, CopyAssignable and MoveAssignable requirements of the C++ Standard Library, and can be used in standard library containers. Comparison operators are supplied so that shared_ptr works with the standard library’s associative containers.

Because the implementation uses reference counting, cycles of shared_ptr instances will not be reclaimed. For example, if main() holds a shared_ptr to A, which directly or indirectly holds a shared_ptr back to A, A’s use count will be 2. Destruction of the original `shared_ptr will leave A dangling with a use count of 1. Use weak_ptr to "break cycles."

The class template is parameterized on T, the type of the object pointed to. shared_ptr and most of its member functions place no requirements on T; it is allowed to be an incomplete type, or void. Member functions that do place additional requirements (constructors, reset) are explicitly documented below.

shared_ptr<T> can be implicitly converted to shared_ptr<U> whenever T* can be implicitly converted to U*. In particular, shared_ptr<T> is implicitly convertible to shared_ptr<T const>, to shared_ptr<U> where U is an accessible base of T, and to shared_ptr<void>.

shared_ptr is now part of the C++11 Standard, as std::shared_ptr.

Starting with Boost release 1.53, shared_ptr can be used to hold a pointer to a dynamically allocated array. This is accomplished by using an array type (T[] or T[N]) as the template parameter. There is almost no difference between using an unsized array, T[], and a sized array, T[N]; the latter just enables operator[] to perform a range check on the index.

A simple guideline that nearly eliminates the possibility of memory leaks is: always use a named smart pointer variable to hold the result of new. Every occurence of the new keyword in the code should have the form:

It is, of course, acceptable to use another smart pointer in place of shared_ptr above; having T and Y be the same type, or passing arguments to the constructor of Y is also OK.

If you observe this guideline, it naturally follows that you will have no explicit delete statements; try/catch constructs will be rare.

Avoid using unnamed shared_ptr temporaries to save typing; to see why this is dangerous, consider this example:

The function ok follows the guideline to the letter, whereas bad constructs the temporary shared_ptr in place, admitting the possibility of a memory leak. Since function arguments are evaluated in unspecified order, it is possible for new int(2) to be evaluated first, g() second, and we may never get to the shared_ptr constructor if g throws an exception. See Herb Sutter’s treatment of the issue for more information.

The exception safety problem described above may also be eliminated by using the make_shared or allocate_shared factory functions defined in <boost/smart_ptr/make_shared.hpp>. These factory functions also provide an efficiency benefit by consolidating allocations.

shared_ptr is defined in <boost/smart_ptr/shared_ptr.hpp>.

See shared_ptr_example.cpp for a complete example program. The program builds a std::vector and std::set of shared_ptr objects.

Note that after the containers have been populated, some of the shared_ptr objects will have a use count of 1 rather than a use count of 2, since the set is a std::set rather than a std::multiset, and thus does not contain duplicate entries. Furthermore, the use count may be even higher at various times while push_back and insert container operations are performed. More complicated yet, the container operations may throw exceptions under a variety of circumstances. Getting the memory management and exception handling in this example right without a smart pointer would be a nightmare.

One common usage of shared_ptr is to implement a handle/body (also called pimpl) idiom which avoids exposing the body (implementation) in the header file.

The shared_ptr_example2_test.cpp sample program includes a header file, shared_ptr_example2.hpp, which uses a shared_ptr to an incomplete type to hide the implementation. The instantiation of member functions which require a complete type occurs in the shared_ptr_example2.cpp implementation file. Note that there is no need for an explicit destructor. Unlike ~scoped_ptr, ~shared_ptr does not require that T be a complete type.

shared_ptr objects offer the same level of thread safety as built-in types. A shared_ptr instance can be "read" (accessed using only const operations) simultaneously by multiple threads. Different shared_ptr instances can be "written to" (accessed using mutable operations such as operator= or reset) simultaneously by multiple threads (even when these instances are copies, and share the same reference count underneath.)

Any other simultaneous accesses result in undefined behavior.

Examples:

Starting with Boost release 1.33.0, shared_ptr uses a lock-free implementation on most common platforms.

If your program is single-threaded and does not link to any libraries that might have used shared_ptr in its default configuration, you can #define the macro BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS on a project-wide basis to switch to ordinary non-atomic reference count updates.

(Defining BOOST_SP_DISABLE_THREADS in some, but not all, translation units is technically a violation of the One Definition Rule and undefined behavior. Nevertheless, the implementation attempts to do its best to accommodate the request to use non-atomic updates in those translation units. No guarantees, though.)

You can define the macro BOOST_SP_USE_PTHREADS to turn off the lock-free platform-specific implementation and fall back to the generic pthread_mutex_t-based code.

The weak_ptr class template stores a "weak reference" to an object that’s already managed by a shared_ptr. To access the object, a weak_ptr can be converted to a shared_ptr using the shared_ptr constructor taking weak_ptr, or the weak_ptr member function lock. When the last shared_ptr to the object goes away and the object is deleted, the attempt to obtain a shared_ptr from the weak_ptr instances that refer to the deleted object will fail: the constructor will throw an exception of type boost::bad_weak_ptr, and weak_ptr::lock will return an empty shared_ptr.

Every weak_ptr meets the CopyConstructible and Assignable requirements of the C++ Standard Library, and so can be used in standard library containers. Comparison operators are supplied so that weak_ptr works with the standard library’s associative containers.

weak_ptr operations never throw exceptions.

The class template is parameterized on T, the type of the object pointed to.

Compared to shared_ptr, weak_ptr provides a very limited subset of operations since accessing its stored pointer is often dangerous in multithreaded programs, and sometimes unsafe even within a single thread (that is, it may invoke undefined behavior.) Pretend for a moment that weak_ptr had a get member function that returned a raw pointer, and consider this innocent piece of code:

Imagine that after the if, but immediately before r is used, another thread executes the statement p.reset(). Now r is a dangling pointer.

The solution to this problem is to create a temporary shared_ptr from q:

Now r holds a reference to the object that was pointed by q. Even if p.reset() is executed in another thread, the object will stay alive until r goes out of scope or is reset. By obtaining a shared_ptr to the object, we have effectively locked it against destruction.

weak_ptr is defined in <boost/smart_ptr/weak_ptr.hpp>.

The function templates make_shared and allocate_shared provide convenient, safe and efficient ways to create shared_ptr objects.

Consistent use of shared_ptr can eliminate the need to use an explicit delete, but alone it provides no support in avoiding explicit new. There were repeated requests from users for a factory function that creates an object of a given type and returns a shared_ptr to it. Besides convenience and style, such a function is also exception safe and considerably faster because it can use a single allocation for both the object and its corresponding control block, eliminating a significant portion of shared_ptr construction overhead. This eliminates one of the major efficiency complaints about shared_ptr.

The family of overloaded function templates, make_shared and allocate_shared, were provided to address this need. make_shared uses the global operator new to allocate memory, whereas allocate_shared uses an user-supplied allocator, allowing finer control.

The rationale for choosing the name make_shared is that the expression make_shared<Widget>() can be read aloud and conveys the intended meaning.

Originally the Boost function templates allocate_shared and make_shared were provided for scalar objects only. There was a need to have efficient allocation of array objects. One criticism of class template shared_array was always the lack of a utility like make_shared that uses only a single allocation. When shared_ptr was enhanced to support array types, additional overloads of allocate_shared and make_shared were provided for array types.

make_shared and allocate_shared are defined in <boost/smart_ptr/make_shared.hpp>.

The common requirements that apply to all make_shared and allocate_shared overloads, unless specified otherwise, are described below.